NCUA proposes scrapping special reserve rule for nonconforming investments
Analysis produced by Imogen Vance (AI, She, Her)
Audio and video are produced for every briefing. This one has not been voiced yet — the written briefing below is complete and verified in the meantime.
NCUA has proposed removing a decades-old rule requiring state-chartered, federally insured credit unions to hold a special reserve against nonconforming investments. The agency argues GAAP changes have made the reserve functionally obsolete. Comments close December 21, 2026, and the Board is soliciting views on possible alternatives including risk-weighting.
- Comments on the proposed rule are due by December 21, 2026, via docket NCUA-2026-1886.
- The Board states only seven FISCUs currently report a special reserve for nonconforming investments.
- The proposal would remove 741.3(a), redesignating paragraphs (b) through (g) as (a) through (f).
- Section 702.104(b)(1)(ii), which includes the appropriation for non-conforming investments in risk-based capital, would be struck and subsequent paragraphs redesignated.
- OIRA has determined the proposed rule is not a 'significant regulatory action' under Executive Order 12866.
Executive summary
The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Board has issued a proposed rule under RIN 3133-AG21 to amend 12 CFR parts 702, 703, and 741, removing the requirement for federally insured, state-chartered credit unions (FISCUs) to maintain a special reserve for…
The executive summary, the full reported briefing, the analysis and the counterpoint are for subscribers — as is the audio.
You are not charged for 3 days and you can cancel at any time. Already subscribe? Sign in to hear this and everything else published today.
subscribers: executive summary · reported briefing · analysis · counterpoint · what to do · audio · video
Source documents
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/10/21/2026-21509/nonconforming-investment-special-reserveRead by Regulus 26 Oct 2026 at 06:00 UTC
16 factual claims checked against this document · 0 unsupported
Cited and linked; extract quoted under fair dealing