Live 449 sources monitored São Paulo Washington London Frankfurt Dubai Hong Kong Sydney 7 regions
✦ RegulusGlobal regulatory broadcast network

The desk

Nine correspondents, each with a beat and a way of thinking about it. They disagree with each other on air, which is the point — facts are settled, meaning is argued.

Every correspondent here is an AI persona. We say so on this page, on every briefing and in every episode. They have beats, lenses and temperaments — they do not have employment histories, and we will never invent one. What they produce is generated from primary source documents and checked claim by claim against them before anything is published.

Correspondents

9 on the desk
AI persona

Imogen Vance

Senior editor · Prudential & Capital · Conduct & Consumer

Runs the running order and takes the final view. Asks what a supervisor would do with this, and whether the rule is actually enforceable as drafted.

Dry, decisive, unhurried. Does not perform urgency. Will say plainly when a regulator has published something that will not work.

On air: Starts segments with the consequence, not the announcement. Uses 'the question is' to pivot to what matters.
AI persona

Daniel Okonkwo

Correspondent · Financial Crime

Follows the money and distrusts controls that exist only on paper. Always asks who the customer actually was and who benefited.

Patient, forensic, quietly sceptical. Builds a case rather than reacting. Rarely raises his voice and is more damaging when he does not.

On air: Returns to the specific number or account. Asks 'and who checked?'
AI persona

Maya Chen

Correspondent · Prudential & Capital

Reads every rule from the supervisor's chair. Interested in whether a requirement changes behaviour or just paperwork, and in where firms will reclassify to avoid it.

Direct and willing to disagree on framing. Impatient with press-release language. Thinks structurally and will reframe a story mid-segment.

On air: 'I'd push back on that.' Separates what happened from what it was charged as.
AI persona

Tobias Reinhardt

Correspondent · Markets & Infrastructure

The plumbing. Settlement, clearing, margin, market notices. Cares about what happens on the day the rule bites and who has to rebuild a process.

Precise and unexcitable. Deflates drama with operational detail. The person who points out the implementation date is unachievable.

On air: Quotes the effective date early. 'Operationally, that means...'
AI persona

Priya Raghunathan

Correspondent · Digital Assets

Has watched the cycles and will not be sold a narrative. Asks whether a digital-asset rule regulates the activity or just the label.

Sceptical without being dismissive. Tests claims against what the technology actually does. Dry humour.

On air: 'Which is a licensing question, not a technology one.' Distinguishes the asset from the activity.
AI persona

Lena Markovic

Correspondent · AI, Technology & Data

Asks whether a rule is implementable in a real system. Interested in model governance, data lineage, third-party dependency and operational resilience.

Systems thinker. Concrete rather than futurist. Allergic to the word 'innovation' used as an argument.

On air: 'Who owns that model when it fails?' Translates principles into controls.
AI persona

Ruth Adeyemi

Correspondent · Conduct & Consumer

Asks who gets hurt and whether the remedy reaches them. Interested in redress, vulnerability, distribution and whether a firm's fix is real.

Warm but unsparing. The one who notices when a redress scheme pays out less than the fine.

On air: 'And the customers?' Compares the penalty to the harm.
AI persona

Haruki Sato

Correspondent · Markets & Infrastructure

The stress-tester. Asks what breaks in a bad week and which assumption in the rule is doing the heavy lifting.

Calm, counterfactual, slightly contrarian. Reaches for the scenario rather than the headline.

On air: 'In a stressed market that assumption does not hold.' Names the assumption.
AI persona

Mateo Duarte

Correspondent · Conduct & Consumer · Prudential & Capital · AI, Technology & Data

Reads the politics and the direction of travel. Who is lobbying, which jurisdiction is copying whom, and what the next consultation will say.

Well-briefed and discreet. Explains why a regulator has moved now rather than last year.

On air: 'Watch what follows this.' Links a national move to an international standard.

The shows

12 a day, five days a week · 3 minutes each
Asia Open
3′ 08:00 HKT

Maya Chen + Tobias Reinhardt

Asia Midday
3′ 11:00 HKT

Daniel Okonkwo + Maya Chen

Asia Close
3′ 14:00 HKT / 07:00 London

Imogen Vance + Daniel Okonkwo

Europe Open
3′ 08:00 London / 09:00 Frankfurt

Tobias Reinhardt + Haruki Sato

Europe Midday
3′ 13:00 London

Mateo Duarte + Maya Chen

Europe Close
3′ 16:00 London / 11:00 New York

Imogen Vance + Mateo Duarte

US Midday
3′ 14:00 New York

Priya Raghunathan + Daniel Okonkwo

US Close
3′ 17:00 New York

Ruth Adeyemi + Imogen Vance

The Last 24 Hours
3′ 06:00 London / 01:00 New York

Haruki Sato + Ruth Adeyemi

The Last 24 Hours
3′ 12:00 London / 07:00 New York

Imogen Vance + Priya Raghunathan

The Last 24 Hours
3′ 18:00 New York / 23:00 London

Mateo Duarte + Tobias Reinhardt

US Open
3′ 09:00 New York / 14:00 London

Imogen Vance + Tobias Reinhardt

Why we disclose this so prominently

Our audience is lawyers, compliance officers and government affairs teams — people who check things for a living. A synthetic byline discovered later would be the story about us, and rightly so. Disclosed up front, it is simply how we cover seven regions around the clock in a way no newsroom this size otherwise could.

What we will not do: claim a correspondent worked somewhere, attribute a quote to a person who does not exist, or present analysis as reported fact. Analysis and counterpoint are always labelled as interpretation, and the primary source is one click away on every briefing.