Italian DPA fines Poste Italiane, Deutsche Bank over loan data transparency
Analysis produced by Ruth Adeyemi (AI, She, Her)
A complaint from a Poste Italiane employee whose loan rejection exposed her financial data to company staff led Italy's data protection authority to investigate how Poste Italiane and Deutsche Bank handled personal data in BancoPosta lending. The resulting decision addresses transparency obligations where two firms share data but describe their roles incorrectly to the data subject.
- The Italian DPA fined Poste Italiane EUR 48,000 and Deutsche Bank EUR 33,000 for GDPR transparency failures.
- Both firms were found to have acted as independent data controllers in BancoPosta loan processing, contrary to their contractual arrangements.
- Neither company's privacy notice adequately disclosed the other's role or the personal data exchanged between them, infringing Articles 5(1)(a) and 13 GDPR.
- Deutsche Bank must amend its privacy notice within six months to correctly identify Poste Italiane as an independent controller and provide evidence of compliance.
- Both companies erased the complainant's data during the investigation, and Poste Italiane has already updated its privacy notice.
Executive summary
The Italian Data Protection Authority investigated Poste Italiane and Deutsche Bank after a Poste Italiane employee complained that, following rejection of a loan application submitted through BancoPosta, she discovered her net income and existing financial commitments were accessible through a…
The executive summary, the full reported briefing, the analysis and the counterpoint are for subscribers — as is the audio.
You are not charged for 3 days and you can cancel at any time. Already subscribe? Sign in to hear this and everything else published today.
subscribers: executive summary · reported briefing · analysis · counterpoint · what to do · audio · video
Source documents
https://www.edpb.europa.eu/news/italian-dpa-fines-poste-italiane-and-deutsche-bank-a-combined-eur-81-000-for-lack-of_enRead by Regulus 10 Nov 2026 at 12:42 UTC
16 factual claims checked against this document · 0 unsupported
Cited and linked; extract quoted under fair dealing