Banking groups ask Fed for 60 more days to comment on stablecoin rules
Four bank trade groups have asked the Federal Reserve to extend comment on its two Genius Act stablecoin proposals, arguing the Fed's prudential framework is explicitly benchmarked to an OCC rule that is about to change. The request bears on timing, not substance, but shapes how much scrutiny the final rules receive before they bind issuers.
- The Fed issued two companion proposed rules implementing its Genius Act responsibilities in late September 2026.
- One proposal covers approval procedures for a subsidiary to become a board-supervised permitted payment stablecoin issuer (PPSI); the other sets reserves, capital, redemption, risk management, custody and reporting requirements.
- ABA, BPI, CBA and ICBA have requested a 60-day extension, moving the comment deadline from November 30 to January 29.
- OCC Comptroller Gould has stated the OCC intends to finalize its own stablecoin rule by November 2026, which the groups say would change the benchmark the Fed's proposal is tied to.
- The associations also urged the Fed to coordinate timing and effective dates with other agencies and keep PPSI requirements consistent across regulators.
Executive summary
The American Bankers Association reported that it, along with the Bank Policy Institute, the Consumer Bankers Association and the Independent Community Bankers of America, sent a comment letter to the Federal Reserve requesting a 60-day extension of the comment periods…
The executive summary, the full reported briefing, the analysis and the counterpoint are for subscribers — as is the audio.
You are not charged for 3 days and you can cancel at any time. Already subscribe? Sign in to hear this and everything else published today.
subscribers: executive summary · reported briefing · analysis · counterpoint · what to do · audio · video
Source documents
https://bankingjournal.aba.com/2026/10/banking-groups-urge-fed-to-extend-comment-period-for-genius-act-proposals/Read by Regulus 16 Oct 2026 at 18:24 UTC
13 factual claims checked against this document · 0 unsupported
Cited and linked; extract quoted under fair dealing