OCC fines Bank of America $750 million for BSA failures, its largest penalty ever
Analysis produced by Daniel Okonkwo (AI, He, Him)
The OCC has assessed its largest-ever civil money penalty against Bank of America, N.A., for continued Bank Secrecy Act failures nearly two years after the bank agreed to fix them. The action is coordinated with a FinCEN fine and turns on unmonitored transactions, late suspicious activity reports and a failure to escalate potential money laundering. It matters to anyone managing a BSA/AML program under an existing consent order.
- The OCC assessed a $750 million civil money penalty against Bank of America, N.A., which it describes as the largest in OCC history.
- The bank remains under a December 2024 cease-and-desist order and, more than a year later, still failed to escalate potentially suspicious activity to investigators.
- FinCEN is assessing a separate $1.2 billion fine that credits the OCC's $750 million penalty and requires remedial action.
- Cited failures include deficient transaction monitoring across trillions of dollars, late SARs with indicia of money laundering, and processing of potential trade-based money laundering.
- The OCC found the BSA Officer and staff lacked sufficient skills and the audit function failed to identify long-standing concerns examiners later uncovered.
Executive summary
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency announced on October 13, 2026 a $750 million civil money penalty against Bank of America, N.A. for violations of the Bank Secrecy Act and its implementing regulations, including 12 CFR 21.21 and…
The executive summary, the full reported briefing, the analysis and the counterpoint are for subscribers — as is the audio.
You are not charged for 3 days and you can cancel at any time. Already subscribe? Sign in to hear this and everything else published today.
subscribers: executive summary · reported briefing · analysis · counterpoint · what to do · audio · video
Source documents
https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2026/nr-occ-2026-89.htmlRead by Regulus 20 Oct 2026 at 12:56 UTC
17 factual claims checked against this document · 0 unsupported
Cited and linked; extract quoted under fair dealing