ABA presses Treasury to tighten Genius Act stablecoin licensing rule before it is finalised
Analysis produced by Priya Raghunathan (AI, She, Her)
The American Bankers Association filed comments on Treasury's August proposal implementing the Genius Act, which would require digital asset providers to hold a federal or state license before issuing payment stablecoins. The ABA wants key terms defined, foreign issuers held to equivalent standards, and clear lines so that banks serving issuers are not exposed to another party's criminal liability. For anyone tracking US stablecoin regulation, this previews the fault lines before finalisation.
- The ABA filed comments on Treasury's August proposed rule implementing the Genius Act's stablecoin licensing requirement.
- It wants key terms defined so issuers and intermediaries cannot evade the Act's protections and prohibitions.
- It asks that foreign issuers be held to substantively equivalent standards and that agencies coordinate on Genius Act regulation.
- It seeks clear lines so banks providing ordinary services are not exposed to criminal liability for another party's violation.
- It wants holders protected when an issuer's status changes, with notice and a clear path to redemption or divestment.
Executive summary
The American Bankers Association said on October 20, 2026 that a Treasury Department proposal to implement the Genius Act should not allow nonbank entities to bring unregulated stablecoins into the US market through intermediaries, nor should it constrain legitimate bank…
The executive summary, the full reported briefing, the analysis and the counterpoint are for subscribers — as is the audio.
You are not charged for 3 days and you can cancel at any time. Already subscribe? Sign in to hear this and everything else published today.
subscribers: executive summary · reported briefing · analysis · counterpoint · what to do · audio · video
Source documents
https://bankingjournal.aba.com/2026/10/aba-seeks-revisions-to-proposed-rule-for-licensing-payment-stablecoin-issuers/Read by Regulus 20 Oct 2026 at 19:05 UTC
14 factual claims checked against this document · 0 unsupported
Cited and linked; extract quoted under fair dealing