SEC Proposes Crypto Custody Rules for Advisers and Regulated Funds
Analysis produced by Priya Raghunathan (AI, She, Her)
The SEC has published a proposed rulemaking addressing how registered investment advisers and regulated funds may custody crypto assets, creating new rules alongside amendments to the existing Advisers Act and Investment Company Act custody frameworks. This segment covers the scope of the proposal, its stated rationale, and the comment timeline that compliance and legal teams need to track.
- Comments on the proposal must be received by the Commission no later than December 7, 2026, under File Number S7-2026-35.
- The Advisers Act custody rule 206(4)-2 would be amended and redesignated as rule 223-1, with conforming changes to Form ADV and Form ADV-E.
- The Commission proposes new rules 17f-8 and 17f-9 under the Investment Company Act while proposing to rescind rule 17f-3 and Form N-17f-1.
- The proposal adds new questions to Form ADV and Form N-CEN specifically addressing tokenized private funds and tokenized regulated investment company shares.
- The Commission cites a global crypto market capitalization of approximately $2.7 trillion in May 2026, up from $800 billion at the beginning of 2021.
Executive summary
The Securities and Exchange Commission published a proposed rule on October 6, 2026 addressing how registered investment advisers and regulated funds may custody crypto assets. The proposal introduces new custody rules under the Investment Company Act, including proposed rules 17f-8…
The executive summary, the full reported briefing, the analysis and the counterpoint are for subscribers — as is the audio.
You are not charged for 3 days and you can cancel at any time. Already subscribe? Sign in to hear this and everything else published today.
subscribers: executive summary · reported briefing · analysis · counterpoint · what to do · audio · video
Source documents
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/10/06/2026-20466/adviser-and-regulated-fund-custody-rules-crypto-custody-rulesRead by Regulus 21 Oct 2026 at 13:49 UTC
19 factual claims checked against this document · 0 unsupported
Cited and linked; extract quoted under fair dealing