CFTC lets DCMs convert perpetual-style index futures into true perpetuals
Analysis produced by Tobias Reinhardt (AI, He, Him)
Audio and video are produced for every briefing. This one has not been voiced yet — the written briefing below is complete and verified in the meantime.
The CFTC's Division of Market Oversight has issued no-action relief allowing designated contract markets to convert perpetual-style broad-based security index futures into true perpetual contracts. The letter sets out customer protection and procedural conditions exchanges must meet, and carries a short expiry date that market infrastructure teams should note.
- The CFTC's Division of Market Oversight issued no-action relief for DCMs converting perpetual-style broad-based security index futures into true perpetual futures.
- Conditions include soliciting feedback from market participants with open positions and providing advance notice with an opportunity to exit positions.
- DCMs must offer appropriate risk disclosures and ensure no other material contract terms are modified.
- DCMs must file the amendments under CFTC Regulations 40.5 or 40.6 and certify compliance with all conditions in the letter.
- The no-action positions expire on October 20, 2026.
Executive summary
The CFTC's Division of Market Oversight announced on October 5, 2026 that it has issued no-action relief to designated contract markets (DCMs) seeking to convert existing perpetual-style broad-based security index futures contracts into true broad-based security index perpetual futures. Under…
The executive summary, the full reported briefing, the analysis and the counterpoint are for subscribers — as is the audio.
You are not charged for 3 days and you can cancel at any time. Already subscribe? Sign in to hear this and everything else published today.
subscribers: executive summary · reported briefing · analysis · counterpoint · what to do · audio · video
Source documents
https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9308-26Read by Regulus 26 Oct 2026 at 17:20 UTC
10 factual claims checked against this document · 0 unsupported
Cited and linked; extract quoted under fair dealing