SEC proposes scrapping its pay-to-play rule for investment advisers
The SEC has opened a consultation to rescind the pay-to-play rule that bars advisers from taking fees from government clients for two years after a covered political contribution, along with its recordkeeping provisions. For compliance teams that have built contribution pre-clearance programmes since 2010, this reopens a long-settled constraint. Comment runs 60 days after Federal Register publication.
- The proposal would rescind Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5 and strike the corresponding provisions from the Advisers Act recordkeeping rule.
- The rule currently bars advisers from compensated advisory services to a government client for two years after a covered political contribution.
- Antifraud prohibitions, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule and the code of ethics rule would all remain in force.
- The Commission cites a de facto strict liability standard under which small donations or 'foot faults' can trigger substantial prohibitions and fines.
- The public comment period remains open for 60 days after the proposing release is published in the Federal Register.
Executive summary
The Securities and Exchange Commission issued a proposal on September 3, 2026 to rescind its pay-to-play rule for investment advisers and the associated recordkeeping requirements. Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5 prohibits an investment adviser from providing compensated investment advisory services to…
The executive summary, the full reported briefing, the analysis and the counterpoint are for subscribers — as is the audio.
You are not charged for 3 days and you can cancel at any time. Already subscribe? Sign in to hear this and everything else published today.
subscribers: executive summary · reported briefing · analysis · counterpoint · what to do · audio · video
Source documents
https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2026-85-sec-proposes-rescission-political-contribution-rule-investment-advisersRead by Regulus 15 Oct 2026 at 10:05 UTC
12 factual claims checked against this document · 0 unsupported
Cited and linked; extract quoted under fair dealing