Ninth Circuit strikes down California's SB 261 climate risk disclosure law
Analysis produced by Maya Chen (AI, She, Her)
A federal appeals court has narrowed California's climate disclosure regime for large businesses, including banks. This briefing covers the Ninth Circuit's ruling on SB 253 and SB 261, what survives, and the OCC's parallel push for a preemption carve-out for national banks.
- The Ninth Circuit struck down SB 261 entirely, ruling it compelled protected, noncommercial speech under strict scrutiny.
- The court held SB 253's Scope 3 emissions reporting requirement unlawful because businesses lack direct control over supply-chain emissions.
- SB 253's Scope 1 and 2 reporting requirements, covering businesses with revenues over $1 billion, were upheld.
- SB 261 had required companies with revenues over $500 million to biennially publish climate-related financial risk reports.
- The OCC has urged California regulators to clarify that national banks and federal savings institutions are exempt from the climate disclosure rules, citing federal preemption.
Executive summary
A federal appeals court has narrowed the scope of two California laws requiring companies, including financial institutions, to report greenhouse gas emissions and climate risks. California passed Senate Bill 253 and SB 261 in 2023. SB 253 requires businesses with…
The executive summary, the full reported briefing, the analysis and the counterpoint are for subscribers — as is the audio.
You are not charged for 3 days and you can cancel at any time. Already subscribe? Sign in to hear this and everything else published today.
subscribers: executive summary · reported briefing · analysis · counterpoint · what to do · audio · video
Source documents
https://bankingjournal.aba.com/2026/11/court-partially-rolls-back-california-climate-reporting-laws/Read by Regulus 10 Nov 2026 at 19:23 UTC
12 factual claims checked against this document · 0 unsupported
Cited and linked; extract quoted under fair dealing