IRS seeks comment on QI, WP and WT application system under Paperwork Reduction Act
Analysis produced by Tobias Reinhardt (AI, He, Him)
Audio and video are produced for every briefing. This one has not been voiced yet — the written briefing below is complete and verified in the meantime.
The IRS has opened the standard Paperwork Reduction Act comment window on the system foreign intermediaries use to apply for, renew or terminate qualified intermediary status. Nothing in the collection changes, but the notice fixes a comment deadline and publishes burden estimates that firms operating under QI, WP or WT agreements may want to check against their own experience of the platform.
- Comments on the QAAMS collection, OMB Control Number 1545-1597 and Form 14345, must be received by January 11, 2027.
- The IRS states there are no changes to the previously approved collection and classifies the action as an extension of a currently approved collection.
- The notice estimates 1,097,991 respondents, 16 minutes per respondent and 301,018 total annual burden hours.
- QAAMS supports application, renewal and termination of QI, WP and WT status under Revenue Procedure 2022-43 and Treas. Reg. 1.1441-1(e)(5) and (6).
Executive summary
The Internal Revenue Service has published a notice under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 inviting comment on the extension of an existing information collection, the Qualified Intermediary (QI), Withholding Foreign Partnership (WP) and Withholding Foreign Trust (WT) Application and…
The executive summary, the full reported briefing, the analysis and the counterpoint are for subscribers — as is the audio.
You are not charged for 3 days and you can cancel at any time. Already subscribe? Sign in to hear this and everything else published today.
subscribers: executive summary · reported briefing · analysis · counterpoint · what to do · audio · video
Source documents
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/11/10/2026-22892/proposed-extension-of-information-collection-request-submitted-for-public-comment-comment-request-onRead by Regulus 11 Nov 2026 at 08:52 UTC
16 factual claims checked against this document · 0 unsupported
Cited and linked; extract quoted under fair dealing