Live 449 sources monitored São Paulo Washington London Frankfurt Dubai Hong Kong Sydney 7 regions
✦ RegulusGlobal regulatory broadcast network

Regulatory heat map

Where it's moving right now · select a region to filter
Showing
region: EUROPE × country: European Union × Clear all

Filtered

4 segments
◷audio queued
European Central Bank European Union Prudential & Capital ✓ 13 claims 12 Oct 2026

ECB tightens collateral rules, moving to second-best ratings for private assets from November

The ECB has published amendments to its monetary policy implementation and haircut guidelines, consolidating four separately announced decisions into binding form effective 30 November 2026. The changes touch how private sector collateral is rated, how haircuts are calibrated, and which COVID-era instruments remain eligible. Treasury and collateral teams at euro area banks need to know what posts, at what haircut, from when.

  • Second-best external rating replaces first-best for private sector collateral from 30 November 2026; euro area public sector assets retain the first-best rule.
  • Haircut schedule updated, refining own-used or retained assets and adding granularity to individual credit claims by amortisation type.
  • COVID-19 guaranteed credit claims eligible only until end-2026; NFC financial subsidiaries reassigned to haircut category III.
◷audio queued
European Central Bank European Union Digital Assets ✓ 23 claims 12 Oct 2026

ECB's Cipollone sets 2029 digital euro target as trilogue nears deadline

Piero Cipollone laid out the ECB's full digital money strategy: a retail digital euro moving through trilogue, and the wholesale Pontes and Appia initiatives for tokenised settlement. The speech matters for the fresh financial-stability modelling on holding limits and for the concrete 2027 pilot and 2029 issuance timeline banks now need to plan against.

  • ECB aims for potential first digital euro issuance in 2029 if legislation concludes by end-2026; trilogue is under way with a Council push to finish this year.
  • Modelling of 2,025 banks shows holding limits up to €3,000 leave aggregate LCR at 163% and project a €127bn deposit inflow by 2034 under business-as-usual.
  • Pontes launched 21 September to settle tokenised transactions in central bank money, full implementation mid-2028; Appia blueprint targeted for 2028.
◷audio queued
ESMA European Union Digital Assets ✓ 11 claims 12 Oct 2026

ESMA tells MiCA-licensed crypto firms to stop serving non-compliant stablecoins

ESMA has issued an opinion drawing a hard line around stablecoins that do not meet MiCA. It tells authorised crypto-asset service providers to cease offering any MiCA service connected to non-compliant asset-referenced and e-money tokens, and directs national regulators to enforce controls and clear legacy exposures within three months. This segment covers what binds, the carve-outs, and the compliance clock.

  • Authorised CASPs must cease all MiCA services linked to non-MiCA-compliant ARTs and EMTs for EU clients.
  • NCAs must require remediation of pre-existing exposures within three months of the 8 October 2026 opinion.
  • Residual activity is confined to liquidation, conversion, withdrawal, transfer or safekeeping, time-limited and supervised.
◷audio queued
Single Resolution Board European Union Digital Assets ✓ 14 claims 11 Oct 2026

SRB flags resolution gaps for stablecoins in response to Commission's MiCA review

The Single Resolution Board has told the European Commission that the current MiCA framework leaves resolution authorities short of tools and information when stablecoin activity threatens credit institutions. This segment covers what the SRB is asking for, the four bank roles it has identified, and why the interaction between MiCA and the EU resolution rulebook is now on the table.

  • SRB says non-credit stablecoin issuers lack a dedicated resolution regime for systemic activity, beyond some supervisory and recovery measures.
  • It wants data-sharing, supervisor-resolution coordination and alignment of MiCA with BRRD and SRMR on reserves, segregation and depositor protection.
  • The response focuses on credit institutions as token issuers and as institutions funded by issuers and crypto-asset service providers.